The Register and ADSL Guide are both reporting the latest antics of Tiscali.
They report that users downloading anything over 30GB a month have been
written to, effectively telling them, "goodbye".
It appears that in January 2005, Tiscali quietly introduced New Terms
and Conditions for New Customers. However, at least they have learnt from
ntl's fiasco a couple of years ago, with customers who signed prior to this
date still subject to Tiscali's Original Conditions.
As far as we can tell the recent enforcement letters are being issued
under the original terms and the more woolly "network integrity and avoid
degradation" Clause 5.9.
The new terms, clause 8.4 now identify that broadband services are capped
to 30GB a month data transfer, that is combined upload and download. Apparently
this can be and is regulated by Tiscali prioritising light users. There
have already been complaints from users seeing marked drops in connection
speeds when they exceed the limits.
Tiscali, in their clause 8.5, have also gone as far as to introduce provisions
whereby they could recover from broadband users charges for their misuse
of broadband. Since the dictionary definitions of misuse include "improper"
or "excessive" there is now a route whereby Tiscali could try to raise additional
charges from their flat rate connection fee.
Tiscali are no longer advertising as "Unlimited", but now "Unlimited Access".
To AntiCap this is a misleading ploy on words. Is "unlimited access" likely
to still be interpreted by Mr Average that you will be able to use that
connection all the time?
Previously users of Tiscali have complained of capping, although the ISP
has denied this. Interestingly The Register's article does show the IPS
has follwed Plusnet's approach of moving heavier users onto one contended
bandwith so that they all compete with each other.
The ISP comes to attention of online media on all too frequent a basis.
The message is clear, if you want to use your connection without watching
your back, avoid Tiscali.